• Home
  • Article
    • Article Archive
    • Digital Archive
    • ENews Archive
  • Buyers Guide
    • Buyers Guide
    • 2025 Online Form
  • Advertising
    • Ad Options
    • Media Kit
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Electronic Files
  • Awards
    • FSEA Gold Leaf
  • Subscribe
  • Video Vault
  • Webinars
  • Amplify
  • Contact
  • Events
    .smi-preview#smi-preview-10580 { --smi-column-gap: 10px; --smi-row-gap: 20px; --smi-color: #ffffff; --smi-hover-color: #90c43c; ; ; --smi-border-width: 0px; ; --smi-border-radius: 0%; --smi-border-color: #3c434a; --smi-border-hover-color: #3c434a; --smi-padding-top: 15px; --smi-padding-right: 0px; --smi-padding-bottom: 0px; --smi-padding-left: 0px; --smi-font-size: 20px; --smi-horizontal-alignment: flex-end; --smi-hover-transition-time: 1s; ; }
    • Skip to main content
    • Skip to secondary menu
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
    • Events
      PostPress

      PostPress

      Print Decorating, Binding and Finishing

      • Home
      • Articles
        • Article Archive
        • Digital Archive
        • ENews Archive
      • Advertising
        • Ad Options
        • Media Kit
        • Editorial Calendar
        • Electronic Files
      • Buyers Guide
        • Buyers Guide
        • 2025 Online Form
      • Awards
        • FSEA Gold Leaf
      • Subscribe
      • Video Vault
      • Webinars
        • Upcoming Webinars
      • Amplify

        2010 Spring

        Where are they now? A Look Back…and Forward…with Three Former Spotlight Companies

        May 1, 2010

        by Dianna Brodine

        In each issue of The Binding Edge, a bindery or loose leaf manufacturer is placed in the “spotlight,” providing an inside look at its history, capabilities, and goals. In this issue, the magazine revisits three of those former Binding Spotlight companies to see what changes have occurred and how the companies have reacted to one of the most challenging periods in the industry’s history. Triggered by a depressed economy, consolidations among printers, and an increasingly demanding customer base, binding and loose leaf have faced faster turnaround times and shorter run lengths. Rickard Bindery, Universal Bookbindery and Trends Presentation Products have weathered the storm. Although the challenges aren’t completely behind them, all are optimistic about the future.

        Rickard Bindery

        Since 1900, Rickard Bindery has been a part of the Chicago landscape. Opened as Rickard Circular Folding Company by Fay Rickard, the company has a long history of technological advancement. In 1922, with Fay’s guidance, the Faydon Sealing Machine Company developed and patented an automatic tabbing and sealing unit and in 1945, Fay developed what is believed to be the first mechanical gate fold attachment. The company has remained family-owned, passing from Fay to his son Les, and then to Les’ son, Jack. Jack is still president of Rickard Bindery, a position he has held since 1966, and his son, Kevin, is currently vice president of operations.

        The bindery keeps its focus on its core competency – folding paper. It has no mechanical binding, perfect binding, or case binding capabilities, and the recent revenue environment has discouraged Rickard Bindery from expanding its service offerings. “Over the past three years, our priority has been fine-tuning the equipment we have on hand, rather than overextending ourselves financially,” explained Kevin Rickard. “With minor adjustments, our existing equipment continues to serve our market niches well.” Those “minor adjustments” include adding glue units, modifying existing folders with special purpose feeders, and adapting the pharmaceutical folders to handle thicker pieces. Rickard Bindery also added automated padding equipment more than a year ago, which has contributed to a more efficient workflow and much quicker turnaround times.

        In 2006, when the company was profiled for the Fall issue, 75 employees operated the folders during three shifts each day, creating pharmaceutical inserts and instruction sheets, coupons and product inserts, and direct-to-market products, like maps. Today, those same products are being produced in three shifts by 70 employees. “Like many of our peers, we’ve adjusted the size of our company to fit the reality of changing market conditions,” said Kevin. “Specifically, we’ve reduced our bindery worker and supervisor workforce as appropriate. However, we serve the high-volume production needs of many customers and are committed to maintaining three-shift capacity.”

        To counteract the impact of the economy, Rickard has made an effort to expand its geographic reach, with 70 percent of its business now coming from outside the greater Chicago metropolitan area. In addition, the bindery has developed manufacturing partnerships with select companies to reduce the amount of capital investment required to maintain its presence in less profitable business sectors. Such partnerships allow Rickard to provide resources to customers without compromising its cost structure. Perhaps most important, Rickard is placing a priority on those customers who pay their bills. “Customers who pay on time and adhere to our terms are our company’s lifeblood,” Kevin explained. “And it may be just us, but we’ve noticed the others tend to go out of business.”

        Rickard Bindery believes that the markets it serves have stabilized, at least from a per-piece volume standpoint. The company expects industry consolidation to continue and that doesn’t worry Kevin: “Consolidation means that fewer companies will produce higher volumes of work. This is good news for Rickard Bindery as long as we prioritize excellent customer service and develop stronger relationships with the survivors.”

        Rickard Bindery is leaner, meaner, and more customer-centric than at any time during its 110-year history. “We may not like certain trends, such as shorter runs and turnaround times, but we’ve learned to adapt,” said Kevin. “One lasting change is that we’ll never take our market position and good fortunes for granted.”

        Universal Bookbindery

        Universal Bookbindery, Inc., located in San Antonio, Texas, was founded in 1918 by Leo Picard and Bob Hearn. After building the business by doing school textbook rebinding, the company evolved into a manufacturer of hard and soft cover books, and then developed a line of highly decorated yearbook covers that were sold to printers and other binderies across the country. A series of acquisitions followed in the 1980s, but Leo Hearn (son of Bob Hearn) repurchased the bookbinding and loose leaf divisions in 1986. That’s when Trip Worden, Leo Hearn’s stepson, made his way back to the company. Attaining the presidency in 1996, Worden has been guiding Universal Bookbindery through the economic downturn.

        Profiled in the Summer 2005 issue of The Binding Edge, Universal Bookbinding continues to specialize in medium- and large-run casebound books, with elaborate covers that could include metal appliqué, embossing, top stamping, spot graining, and antiquing. At the time of its Spotlight article, Universal Bookbindery employed 80 full-time employees. These days, the company operates with 65 employees. “Our volume was much larger in 2005, both in number of jobs and total sales dollars,” explained Worden. “The recent slowdown really didn’t affect us until winter of 2009, but now it has forced us to adjust our employment levels.” The company continued to reinvest in the business, adding a new high-speed Kolbus DA-270 casemaker and a Polar cutting system with jogger and unloader in 2008. “Each of our significant equipment and technology acquisitions has helped us be more competitive and react quicker to the market,” he said.

        With volume down, Worden took the opportunity to embrace Lean Manufacturing Training. “The San Antonio Manufacturers Association has been touting the benefits of lean for a while, but the thing that made me realize it was a worthwhile process to undertake during a down time was watching our local Toyota plant,” stated Worden. The Toyota plant had been hit hard by the economy and, during the summer of 2009, the plant was idled for eight weeks. Employees were kept on with reduced hours to work through the enhanced lean manufacturing process. Worden decided the time was right. “I will tell you, it’s not easy and it’s not cheap, but I believe lean manufacturing has been a great thing for us,” he said. “We were already a well-organized, well-lit manufacturing plant. But you look at us now and look at us a year ago, and it’s a world of difference.” Focused on eliminated waste – including labor, time, and actual materials – lean manufacturing promotes a highly organized plant floor. “Lean promotes reduced spoilage and, while we can occasionally stub our toes, we have been really impressed with how well the plant floor operates,” stated Worden.

        A significant change to the atmosphere at Universal Bookbindery occurred in January of 2010 when Leo Hearn passed away. Although a succession plan had been in place for 15 years and Hearn was no longer involved in the day-to-day operations, his absence has left a noticeable gap. “When he passed away, it was more of a jolt than I thought it would be,” said Worden. “With business down, it would have been nice to have him available to talk about the current challenges and solutions to those challenges.”

        Worden believes that over the next five years, the companies that have made wise investments in their people, equipment, and facilities will be serving a customer base that – while probably smaller than is in place today – will be glad to have successful finishing options available to them. “It appears the market is shrinking,” said Worden, “but we do not feel it is in danger of going away. There will always be a need to print and bind the printed word, along with offering creative packaging solutions for a wide variety of users. The investments we made when times were good are a good part of why we’re still here today.”

        Trends Presentation Products

        Profiled in the Spring 2005 issue of The Binding Edge, Trends Presentation Products, Washington, Mo., began as Stationers Loose Leaf. Originally an archival binder supplier, Stationers had entered the commercial binder market but the advent of office superstores turned the company’s focus to custom turned-edge binders and packaging. As production lead times were cut, production runs became smaller, and service demands increased, the company attempted to look into the future. It looked as if a web-fed digital press was the answer.

        Trends became the first loose leaf binder manufacturer to purchase a Xeikon web-fed digital press in 1999. The press was large format, 18.7 inches wide by 36 feet, and had duplexing capability. Expensive film, contract proofs, and printing plates were completely eliminated with this new piece of equipment. The Xeikon is still in use today, and Trends has made continual investments to keep the press up-to-date in order to maximize its digital capabilities. Graphic design programs also have been upgraded to ensure the highest quality of graphics.

        Producing custom turned-edge products, including ring binders, catalog binders, post binders, slantboxes, slipcases, tote boxes, menu covers, easel binders, point-of-purchase displays, and much more, Trends still sells exclusively to resellers. “The pressures of the economy, combined with easy accessibility to the internet, have pushed many manufacturers to start selling their products direct,” said David Inman, sales manager. “We have decided against that and want to keep the loyalty and trust between our dealers a priority. We believe that still means something.” Utilizing a variety of techniques, Trends can screenprint, foil stamp, emboss, deboss, diecut, laminate, and use digital technology to customize its products.

        The recent digital/on-demand printing trend seems made to order for Trends Presentation Products. “As demand for faster turnaround, just-in-time delivery, customization using variable data, and shorter runs have increased with digital printing, we feel fortunate to be in our position,” stated Inman. Trends Presentation Products has positioned itself carefully in this niche market, with more than 12 years of experience thanks to its 1999 Xeikon purchase.

        At the same time, the current economy has definitely had an impact. “Like many businesses, we were forced to stop and re-think everything,” said Inman. “This included how we quoted items, deciding what products to offer, how products are delivered, and even how we answered the phones.” The company organized quick pricing methods to ensure timely turnaround for quotes and renegotiated its supplier prices, including shipping rates. Inventory levels were closely watched and Trends found creative ways to continue offering its full line of custom packaging.

        “There is no question that the next five years are going to be challenging for us and for the industry, especially as social media applications increase and become a stronger way for companies to market products,” said Inman. With a soft economy and the tempered buying habits of consumers keeping pressure on price, the focus for Trends Presentation Products will be controlling costs and improving productivity. In addition, Inman believes more consolidation is inevitable for the industry and he is determined that Trends will not become one of the casualties.

        “We believe in our products, service, and customers, and plan to stay optimistic,” he said. “We are operating more efficiently than we ever have before. We know what our customers want and need, and if a project is within our ability to handle it, we will do it. That hasn’t changed.”

        Applying Lean Manufacturing to Binding at Duraweld Ltd.

        May 1, 2010

        by: Staff

        For lean manufacturing to become part of a company’s culture, the majority of team members must think about continuously improving all processes – then make those ideas a reality. Below is an interview with Jamie Swan, production manager at Duraweld Ltd. in Scarborough, England, with a report on the plant’s lean improvements, which began in 2006.

        Q: What triggered Duraweld to begin implementing lean manufacturing practices?
        A: Four years ago, the production manager had left Duraweld due to illness. Richard Senior, the company’s managing director at the time, decided to advertise for a replacement with lean manufacturing experience. For 14 years, I had worked for a U.K. company that was part of a global group supplying the automotive industry. As a project supervisor there, I worked on the implementation of lean techniques like 5s, line balancing, standard operations, and visual management. After I was hired by Duraweld in 2006, I quickly started to implement a program of lean improvements. Richard was very supportive of the changes, and I formed a great partnership with Terry Cooke, Duraweld’s print manager at the time (and now sales manager).

        Q: What goals did Duraweld set when beginning the lean manufacturing process?
        A: Duraweld makes bespoke plastic stationery-protection products, including those with a range of decoration available on a tight turnaround (usually 10 days). As a result, Duraweld had a machine-utilization rate of around 50 percent and a staffing level that could easily deal with impacts. This meant that when an operator stopped making bespoke product, he was directed to make stock products based on a “gut feel” for what was required. The supervisors had a very poor view of what jobs were in the system and had become attuned to “firefighting” the workload.

        I set initial goals to bring under control the waste in motion, conveyance, and overproduction that could be tackled immediately. The medium-term plan was to build a supervisor-led 5s program to drive organizational improvement throughout the plant and construct cell manufacturing units, where possible, to further reduce conveyance time. The ultimate goal was to build the whole entity of Duraweld into a synchronized system that eliminated non-value-added activity across the board.

        The last goal required buy-in at every level of the business. Fortunately, the company’s dedication to integrating the core values of lean into a synchronized system took a step closer to realization with strategic investment in an ERP system and the dedication to delivering improvement by Hannah Senior and Mark Yeung, the company’s new managing directors.

        Q: What were the first steps?
        A: The first steps were considered to be, in lean terms, the low-hanging fruit – easy gains that would allow people to feel more in control of their workload. Our first step was to convert a “push” manufacturing flow to a “pull” process, which involved creating a visual management system that incorporates scheduling and maintenance. Kanbans also were introduced to stop overproduction. Previously, the material was issued for a job when the order was placed – even before that job was scheduled to begin. By simply changing to issuing material as a job commences meant that no work was carried out unnecessarily, taking up machine time, space in the factory, and other valuable resources.

        The production schedule was handled on an Access database. Using supervisor control, the system tracked jobs through the factory using a traffic-light system: Jobs waiting were red, jobs in progress were amber, and jobs completed were green. Simple visual management techniques, such as shadow boards, make it quick and easy to interpret information about the job in hand.

        The second step was to implement a 5s program that would be communicated to everyone in the business, from the managing director to the cleaner. I chose an area of the factory to become a model of excellence. Using a one-day workshop, the operators from this area were given an overview of the 5s and what we wanted to achieve by implementing 5s, then carried out a red-tag sorting exercise in the afternoon. The impact of the red-tag session was quite amazing. Duraweld had always been a relatively tidy environment, but during the first sorting session we removed a “hidden factory” of unused equipment and mess from inside the working factory.

        Over the next four weeks, the same team took on the organization and cleaning of the model area. The floor was painted to define the work area, aisle space, and location of necessary items. Storage areas for quick-moving materials were set line-side, and shadow boards for essential tooling were created. We painted the floors under the machines white to assist with early warning of maintenance issues (oil or metal filings are often an early sign of wear). A labeling program ensured that items were always returned to their location and to help with waste management for recycling. Cleaning and maintenance procedures were advertised, and operators moving through the factory were likely to be asked about why they had left their work area.

        Once the model area was set for maximum impact, everyone in the factory was given a tour in small groups to learn about the changes. There were nine more workshop sessions, which followed the same process. Eventually the whole factory has been transformed into a clean and organized workspace. A champion was then nominated for each of the 5s locations (we have 10 areas), who would drive the communication through the team of operators.

        Two cell-manufacturing units were constructed for repeat stock products. By linking the process routes together, we were able to reduce conveyance and set-up time, build product awareness of previous/next process, and increase operator productivity. Kanban cards meant that we made only enough stock to keep supplies topped up, freeing operators to complete other work when the stocks were up to the maximum level.

        Q: What challenges did Duraweld encounter during the implementation?
        A: Duraweld staff responded very positively to the early changes. The workshop sessions helped to clear the path to change. Concrete goals, communicated well, usually have the desired effect. Lean manufacturing is a very simple, commonsense approach to making products, and when people realize that they can contribute, they will get involved.

        There were some less enthusiastic people within the business who thought it was a revolution, rather than an evolution, or just felt that it would disappear as other incentives had. These were usually the people who felt most threatened with change or could see their role diminishing as efficiencies increased. The visual management techniques and work-area organization served to ensure that people were kept working. And by relentlessly challenging people who left their work area, the message eventually got through. Access to proper workflow schedules allowed me to limit the impact of some of the more negative people, and I could keep them busy with long-running work to ensure that their negativity didn’t spread.

        Continuous communication, training, and the discipline to keep going through difficulties make a difference. Promoting positive values and creating an environment where best practice can be shared will eventually generate a momentum that makes it difficult for the dissenters not to join in. It’s a very rewarding moment when you get someone resistant to change to put forward a good suggestion and allow him or her to take the idea forward.

        Q: What has Duraweld done to ensure that the lean manufacturing process will be sustained, long-term? Are there review procedures in place?
        A: To achieve the next two stages of the 5s – standardize and sustain – we needed an audit and feedback system. The audit was devised to keep the areas under visual control, and five supervisors were given two audits to complete bi-monthly. I still provide the feedback to make sure that improvements in any area are communicated and adopted across the shop floor. The 5s audit scores are one of the company’s key performance indicators.

        As a result of cleaning up the shop floor, Duraweld vastly improved its waste segregation and management. With a much-improved environmental policy, Duraweld achieved accreditation for ISO 14001 and pioneered the recycling of our own polypropylene manufacturing waste into print-grade material. We now recycle 100 percent of our manufacturing waste as well as much of our office and break-room waste.

        In 2008 the introduction of Winman SSL, a Windows-based ERP system, allowed Duraweld to integrate electronic lean manufacturing concepts. Production Kanbans are now fully electronic, making tricky changes like seasonal stock adjustments easily manageable. Using a configurator to construct a structure for each quote, we no longer have to estimate costs manually. When the quote converts to an order – the manufacturing order is sent with one mouse click – the tracking schedule is filled with the traffic-light process flow, and the color changes from red to amber or green are generated through bar-code scanning. We also have a binder configurator on our website, where customers can create their own product; when a customer buys an item, the order instantly hits the shop floor. Duraweld is truly beginning to realize its commitment to lean manufacturing excellence across the whole business spectrum.

        Q: How has lean manufacturing affected your production efficiency and profit margin?
        A: Over the past four years, shop-floor staffing levels have been reduced by 37.5 percent – from 72 employees to 45 – meaning a 15 percent drop in our wage bill (even taking into account inflation, pay raises, and multiple increases to the U.K. minimum wage). Fortunately, we were able to gradually make these changes through natural wastage and by not replacing staff as they retired or moved away. Efficient staffing levels allowed us to keep the number of redundancies low when the recession hit. In addition, 49 percent of our products are now standard configured products, reducing office and administrative costs.

        We also make money from our waste materials by good segregation and clean recycling processes. Process capability and control of defects in our main production product lines has just shown the best three-month period yet. In addition, visitors from other manufacturing organizations were given a presentation and tour of our facilities last February in an event organized by the UK Manufacturing Advisory Service. We are very proud of our factory and of a workforce who has responded so well to making lean practices work.

        Troubled Times Demand Dynamic Supplier Relationships

        May 1, 2010

        by Renée A. Varella

        In a challenging economy, strong supplier relationships are more crucial than ever. According to Tom Stein in an article at AllBusiness.com, a recent study showed that more than 90 percent of small- and medium-sized businesses reported that solid supplier ties saved them time and money and helped them in this difficult business environment. Here, three sources in the trade bindery industry explain how they make the most of their supplier-bindery relationships.

        Think Partnership

        The most effective relationships start with the idea that suppliers and binders can form mutually beneficial collaborations. “We consider ourselves partners with our customers,” said Mark Hunt, director of marketing at Standard Finishing Systems, based in Andover, Mass. “Our philosophy is to create a value proposition in which we help trade binders increase efficiency, boost profits, and lower costs. If we can do that, our customers will be successful and so will we, because they’ll come back to us for more post press solutions.”

        “We think of our vendor relationships as partnerships,” agreed Mike Seidl, sales manager at Seidl’s Bindery, Inc. in Houston, Texas. “Finding a company to put your trust in when you’re in trouble and need help out isn’t always easy to come by, so we commit our loyalty to a high-quality and dependable supplier.”

        Understand Expectations

        According to Hunt Nichols, executive vice president and co-owner of BindTech, Inc. of Nashville, Tenn., having clear expectations of your supplier-bindery relationships can facilitate rapport and minimize misunderstandings. “We look to our vendors to provide quality products at a competitive price with on-time deliveries,” he said. “We work with vendors who stand behind their product when issues arise and respect confidentiality with regard to special products and shared client information. We look to partner with companies that can respond quickly to all requests and help us to better service our customers.”

        Seidl understands that suppliers long for binderies to demonstrate purchasing loyalty. “Our suppliers want us to lift up their product by using it regularly and exclusively because we believe in its performance,” he said, “and they want us to convey that to our customers so that their name is known outside of the bindery.” In turn, he added, binderies expect suppliers to work with them in every way possible to meet customers’ expectations. “Suppliers should expect to be called on to answer performance and technical questions about their product and stand behind their product with explanation and financial liability should it fail to work as advertised.”

        Nichols added that suppliers deserve to be paid promptly, to be treated fairly when problems arise, and to have an opportunity to compete on all projects that fit. “If a supplier provides superior service in all regards, it can expect that the bindery will be more likely to showcase and recommend their products to other companies and to gain market share,” he said.

        Tap into Vendor Expertise

        In addition to providing high-quality products and services, the best suppliers help customers solve problems and compete effectively. For example, Hunt noted that Standard Finishing’s key advantages include applications expertise and a comprehensive product line.

        “We have 10 field sales managers and a support team of subject-matter experts who each have more than 20 years of experience,” he said. “Our field team is made up of veterans of the finishing space who understand the emerging technologies and know the cost pressures and tight turn times that trade binders are under.” He noted that the team takes pride in helping customers to identify the most appropriate solutions, adding, “If another company has a better way to do something, we’ll be the first ones to tell you.”

        As for products, Standard Finishing sells a broad line of bindery and paper handling equipment from such suppliers as Horizon of Japan and Hunkeler of Switzerland. “Our integrated feeding and finishing solutions fill a real vacuum in the marketplace right now,” Hunt said. “We’ve worked hard to position ourselves as a source for application-appropriate solutions – whether you need hardware, integration, software, or inspection systems that do verification and tracking.”

        Pay Attention to Pressures

        Inevitably, there will be times when a binder wishes his suppliers better understood his challenges. “Unfortunately our industry has become very much an on-demand, ‘fast-food’ type of industry, in which speed is just as important as quality,” Seidl said, adding that binders now get days to produce projects that used to take weeks. Vendors with a basic knowledge of the machines on the bindery floor can predict what the demands for supplies will be – and expedite material to the binder, if necessary: “The biggest help from our suppliers is for their products to be on our floor the moment we need it.”

        Nichols agreed that a supplier’s promptness and accuracy of information can be as important as the product provided. “The industry moves faster every day, and it takes the bindery’s plus supplier’s best joint efforts to meet customer demands,” he said. “If BindTech’s needs are met, our suppliers can count on a long-term relationship. We recognize and appreciate superior performance by both old and new suppliers.”

        Seidl noted that binderies face the additional challenge of higher shipping costs now that many suppliers have reduced their number of storage facilities. “With the market today, we battle big shipping costs on material for ever-faster-moving projects that we rarely get advanced notice of on arrival,” Seidl said.

        Hunt noted that top suppliers can be an asset, especially in uncertain times. “Ultimately, every binder has a different problem to solve – it might be to knock down labor costs or increase productivity,” he said. “We’re in the problem-solving business, so we’ll work with you, try to understand your needs and your pain point, and help you to succeed.”

        Consider the Competition

        Suppliers able to provide strategic information on the marketplace can be an invaluable resource. “Trade binderies are in a tough spot right now,” Hunt said. “There’s significant downward price pressure and runs lengths are dropping, so binders need to find their profitable niche.”

        Hunt acknowledged that it can be easy for a trade bindery to look at a vendor as someone who’s just trying to sell equipment. “Some trade binders are deeply wedded to their post press equipment and sometimes ask, ‘Why should I invest in a new saddlestitcher when what I’m using has worked fine for 30 years?’ The alternative view is that the guy up the street or across town – who has highly automated systems and is able to do ultra-short runs – will creep into your market and steal business away.”

        If binders don’t invest in new technologies they’re destined to be left behind: “The reality is that some binders today aren’t able to be as competitive on short-run work,” Hunt said. “Our niche is highly automated, quick-changeover equipment geared to more extreme turn times, because that is what the market demands.”

        Keep Communicating

        Strong bindery-supplier relationships require frank communication about needs, goals, timelines, and quality improvements. “We thrive on an open dialogue,” Hunt said, adding that some of Standard Finishing’s best solutions have come from its best customers. “We’re always looking for clever ways to help customers be more productive and competitive. That’s why we like to stay in touch, keep an open mind, and be receptive to input.”

        Those same qualities also work for BindTech’s vendor relationships. “We want our suppliers to be flexible, creative, and open to ideas,” Nichols said. “Our preferred vendors can help us succeed by being able to provide products and solutions, when and where needed, to help us satisfy customer demands.”

        To ride out the recession, spend some time thinking of ways to get the most from your bindery/supplier relationships. By maximize every advantage, you can survive the rough spots, embrace competitive challenges, and plan for growth.

        Adhesives in the Bindery: Environmental Impact

        May 1, 2010

        by: Ken Kroeger, PH.D., L.D. Davis Industries, Inc.

        The Cuyahoga River in Northeastern Ohio was ignited by a spark in 1969. The fact that there was so much oil-soaked debris and sludge floating on the river to sustain a fire was an environmental wake-up call for the American people. Many cite the fire as an impetus for the formation of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 and the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972. These events helped lead adhesive manufacturers away from solvent-based adhesives (adhesive polymers dissolved in organic solvents) and accelerated the development of water-based adhesives that could perform similarly. In terms of reducing the environmental impact of adhesives, this has been the most significant development in adhesive technology. The blaze on the river 41 years ago has led to the situation today in which adhesives have a relatively mild impact on the environment.

        In this second installment of the two-part series about adhesives in the bindery, the environmental impacts of animal glue, resin emulsion, and hot melt adhesives will be compared and contrasted. Keep in mind the overall perspective that all of the adhesives used in the bindery today have a much reduced environmental impact compared to solvent-based adhesives used in decades past. The complete lifecycle of adhesives will be considered: their manufacture from raw materials, use in the bindery, and the post-consumer recycling or disposal of bindery products.

        It’s recommended that you read the first part of this series in the Winter 2010 issue of The Binding Edge since it discusses the nature and composition of these adhesives.

        Animal Glues

        The major raw materials used to manufacture animal glues are technical gelatin, glycerin, Epsom salt, sugars, and water. Technical gelatin is produced industrially by the chemical treatment (hydrolysis) of collagen protein contained in the hides and bones of cattle and pigs. The chemicals used are not environmentally hazardous (usually slaked lime), but gelatin production produces a large amount of waste water that must be treated to reduce the solids content. While the raising of farm animals has a large environmental impact, the main economic drivers of farm animal production are meat and leather production. Therefore, technical gelatin production is only responsible for an extremely small fraction of this environmental impact. Glycerin is produced as a byproduct of cooking oil and soap production. Epsom salt is generally obtained from mines. The sugars used to produce animal glues are produced from corn, a renewable resource. The technical gelatin and Epsom salt are generally obtained overseas, which adds to their carbon footprint.

        The use of recycled materials greatly reduces the environmental impact of animal glue production. The production of pharmaceutical capsules (both hard and softgel capsules) produces a significant amount of gelatin “scrap.” This “scrap,” which contains high-quality pharmaceutical gelatin, can be recycled by using it in place of technical gelatin to produce animal glues. Through contracts with pharmaceutical companies, L.D. Davis Industries uses this “scrap” as the source of approximately 50 percent of the gelatin it uses for animal glue production. This recycling effort saves thousands of metric tons of this “scrap” from reaching landfills every year.

        Animal glues are used in the bindery by applying a moderate heat to maintain the adhesive at 150°F. Animal glues generally contain no volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and clean up easily with water.

        Since even dried animal glues easily disperse in water, they produce absolutely no problem for a repulping process in the recycling of bindery products. In addition, all of the major raw materials used to manufacture animal glues (gelatin, glycerin, Epsom salt, and sugars) are highly biodegradable. When a bindery product ends up in a landfill, the animal glue will biodegrade within weeks of exposure to water.

        Resin Emulsions

        The major raw materials used to manufacture resin emulsion adhesives are polymer emulsions, polyvinyl alcohols, and water. Most of the polymers contained in the emulsions, as well as the polyvinyl alcohols, are ultimately synthesized from acetic acid or ethylene produced in a very energy-intensive process of cracking petroleum. In addition, a large percentage of the petroleum must be shipped from the Middle East, which further increases the carbon footprint. There are no recycled materials used in manufacturing resin emulsions.

        Resin emulsion adhesives are used in the bindery at ambient temperature so no heating energy is used. While resin emulsions generally contain no VOCs, they sometimes require an organic solvent for cleaning.

        Since most dried resin emulsion adhesives will soften and only partially disperse in water, they produce minor problems during the repulping process. Resin emulsions are not biodegradable. While polyvinyl alcohols are biodegradable, the polymer component of the polymer emulsions is not.

        Hot Melts

        The major raw materials used to manufacture hot melt adhesives are the base polymer, tackifying resins, and waxes. Most of the base polymers, tackifying resins, and waxes are ultimately synthesized from petroleum using energy-intensive processes. In addition, a large percentage of the petroleum must be shipped from the Middle East, which further increases the carbon footprint. Generally, there are no recycled materials used in manufacturing hot melts.

        Hot melt adhesives are used in the bindery by applying a large amount of heat to maintain the adhesive at 350°F. However, there are low-temperature hot melts designed for safety and energy efficiency that can be used as low as 250°F. Hot melts contain low or no VOCs. Since hot melts are not soluble in water, clean-up requires a wax, an organic plasticizer, or an organic solvent.

        Since hot melts will not disperse in water, the presence of hot melts in bindery products seriously affects their recyclability. During the repulping process, the hot melts produce “stickies” that hamper the process. Key to the success of a repulping process is having a method to separate the “stickies” from the pulp to prevent compromising paper pulp quality. In addition, all of the raw materials used to manufacture hot melts (base polymers, tackifying resins, and waxes) are generally inert and, therefore, not biodegradable.

        Conclusion

        This two-part series of articles has described the history, composition, uses, and environmental impact of animal glues, resin emulsions, and hot melts used in the bindery. This second installment has compared and contrasted different aspects of the environmental impact associated with these adhesives.

        The animal glue, resin emulsion, and hot melt adhesives used in the bindery today all have a much reduced environmental impact compared to solvent-based adhesives used in the past. Those solvent-based adhesives had very high VOC content, were not biodegradable and, if discarded into a landfill leaching solvents, would produce toxic soil and ground water contamination.

        Animal glues are the friend of the environment. They are the adhesives of choice when high wet tack is needed and the materials to be bonded are absorbent and relatively easy to bond.

        Resin emulsions are the adhesives of choice when a large amount of wet tack is not needed, the materials to be bonded are absorbent, and the materials are more difficult to bond than what animal glues can handle.

        Hot melts are the adhesives of choice when excellent immediate (green) tack is needed and the materials to be bonded are more difficult to bond than what animal glues can handle.

        Acknowledgement

        The author would like to thank Mark Katsaros of H.B. Fuller Company for his assistance.

        Dr. Ken Kroeger has been the research and development manager for L.D. Davis Industries for the past 13 years and is an adjunct professor of chemistry and physics at Wingate University. He has an undergraduate chemistry degree from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Colorado at Boulder. In addition to adhesives, Dr. Kroeger has experience working in the fields of macromolecular X-ray crystallography, atmospheric chemistry, isotope separation, and explosive and pyrotechnic chemistry. L.D. Davis Industries, Inc. is an 84-year-old family-owned company manufacturing both animal glues and resin emulsion adhesives and distributing multiple lines of hot melts for the graphic arts, rigid box, packaging, and other industries. For more information, call (800) 553-3284, email Dr. Kroeger at kkroeger@lddavis.com, or visit www.lddavis.com.

        Fulfillment: Measuring Your Performance

        May 1, 2010

        by: Tom Quinn

        Are you on the leading edge of your industry? Have you incorporated mailing and/or fulfillment into your service mix? If you can answer yes to this question, did you ever wonder how your company was performing compared to your competitors in the mailing and fulfillment industry?

        The printing and binding industries have been fortunate to have associations with ample resources to provide valuable comparison data to gauge the progress of your company compared to similar companies in your industry. The Mailing & Fulfillment Service Association (MFSA) also has a variety of reports and studies conducted on a regular basis to compare both operational and financial performance primarily for the mailing industry, which can be found at www.MFSAnet.org.

        This article will focus on the measurement and calculation of important financial and operational parameters to measure your success in the fulfillment industry. The measurement discussion will be broken into two sections: financials and operational performance. A list of evaluation criteria also is provided.

        Financials

        My duties as director of fulfillment services and chief consultant have allowed me to visit as many as 20 different companies each year for the past six years. Most of these companies were printers just starting in fulfillment or new to the fulfillment industry in the past five years. Their reason for starting a fulfillment operation was to protect print volumes and to help grow the company in the future with an expanded service offering.

        The following discussion of financials should be read with the understanding that a fulfillment operation within your company should yield extremely high bottom line contributions. Certainly, the contribution should be a double-digit contribution. For every dollar billed, a minimum of 10 cents should flow to the bottom line. A 10 percent contribution should be considered a minimal performance level because 20-30 percent contributions to the bottom line are still possible and being realized by efficient and progressive companies in the industry. While the printing and mailing industries are very mature with many buying decisions being made on price alone, the fulfillment industry can still be a very profitable entity. Several general observations from company visits are as follows:

        1. No Financials. Most of the companies visited do not compile a monthly P&L statement for their fulfillment operation and, therefore, do not have any understanding of the contribution to the bottom line for the fulfillment industry. In a recent visit to a company, time was spent with the controller estimating a P&L for the company for the fulfillment operation. The analysis was completed in a very cursory fashion, but the costs associated with the analysis were estimated conservatively (high). This conservative approach still yielded a 20+ percent bottom line contribution, which accounted for most of the company’s annual profit in the year studied. This posed the question, “Are you making any money on print?”

        The financials for a fulfillment operation are simple because there are very few cost parameters: labor, rent, utilities, system, packaging, and shipping make up the bulk of all costs. I do not suggest that the fulfillment operation should try to be fit into the financial structure or operating system designed to report on a bindery operation. The operating system for the bindery was designed to manage and measure a production operation and the fulfillment operation is a service operation. I would suggest an Excel spreadsheet with a simple P&L statement each month to measure the contribution. This statement will have the added benefit of informing fulfillment employees and management of their contribution and providing company management with the ability to establish performance and measurement goals for the future.

        2. Low or No Pricing. The goal to save print and bindery volumes by adding additional services has a dual edge to it. In most cases, the client was saved as a result of adding fulfillment; however, in many cases, the industry gave away critical value-added activities. The most popular giveaway has been storage. Storage is a critical billing parameter for the fulfillment industry. The suggested method for calculating storage cost is to divide total rent and utilities by the number of pallet positions at 80 percent capacity, which will yield a billing parameter of $/pallet/month. If you are just starting your fulfillment operation, conduct a survey of storage costs. Labor pricing should be a minimum of three times the fully loaded cost of the labor category. A fulfillment pricing PowerPoint is available from the Mailing & Fulfillment Service Association to assist in better pricing of fulfillment services.

        3. No Trained Sales Personnel. Very few of the sales personnel in print and bindery operations were trained to sell fulfillment. This results in either very slow or no growth of the fulfillment client base after the initial clients are satisfied. The fulfillment operation, like any other, has a minimum revenue requirement to break even. Very few fulfillment operations start with a large enough client base to become profitable immediately and will depend on future growth to achieve breakeven and the wonderful profit potentials of the operation. Incorporating fulfillment as a valuable tool in the service mix and utilizing the service as an offensive sales tool, instead of a defensive tool, will yield higher revenue and profit in the future.

        Operational Performance

        The operation and performance of a literature fulfillment operation is quite unique. The receipt, storage, assembly, and shipment of sales support materials and data for another company is a niche industry and part of a much larger fulfillment, distribution, and logistics industry. The literature fulfillment industry has been specifically created to support the efforts of marketing departments across the country. The key operational parameter of this industry is inventory accuracy. If you can control and master this one parameter, you are guaranteed success in the industry. Poor inventory accuracy is the primary reason for clients to move their fulfillment operations. However, there are many more operational parameters to measure the efficiency of a fulfillment operation.

        MFSA conducted its first Fulfillment Benchmark Survey in 2004-2005 and again the next year. The results and the details of the study are available on the website. A new Fulfillment Benchmark Survey is due to be introduced this year and will add several operational and financial parameters, also accessible via the internet. By participating in the survey, your company will be able to compare its monthly performance to both your previous submissions and the industry as a whole. Listed below are the operational parameters to be measured in this new study. The calculation methodology for each parameter and an example calculation also are included in the formal plan, and the online site will guide you through the survey process.

        These parameters provide valuable data for you in terms of understanding the success and profitability of your fulfillment operation.

        1. Orders picked per hour. The average number of orders picked per person per hour.

        2. Lines picked per hour. The average number of lines picked per person per hour.

        3. Items (pieces) picked per hour. The average number of items picked per person per hour.

        4. Order turn times. Elapsed time from receipt of order to shipment of order to determine percent same day, percent next day, and percent beyond next day.

        5. Order picking accuracy. The percentage of orders picked with the correct quantities ordered.

        6. Order packing accuracy/appearance. The percentage of orders that are properly packed.

        7. Order shipping accuracy. The percentage of orders shipped error-free. Proper service levels used to meet need-by dates or as specified by client. Packages labeled correctly, completely, and with correct addresses. This parameter pertains to functions completed in the shipping process.

        8. Order accuracy (same as fulfillment accuracy internal). The percentage of orders shipped error-free. This parameter reflects the accuracy of the entire shipping process (picking, packaging, and shipping).

        9. Fulfillment accuracy (external). Number of errors reported by clients.

        10. Receiving cycle time (dock to stock). Elapsed time of arrival of material through the receiving process, assignment of location entry into the inventory system, and available for use…or in the case of a new item, delivery of the sample and receiver copy to the project manager and not entered into the inventory system.

        11. Receiving accuracy. The percentage of items (SKUs) received correctly.

        12. Inventory accuracy. The comparison of inventory system balances to actual counts; usually accomplished during cycle counting. It also can be the result of a complete physical inventory.

        13. Employee turnover (voluntary and involuntary). The number of employees who have left (voluntary and involuntary) v. the number currently employed.

        14. Total revenue per square foot. Total revenue for the company per income statement for the period divided by total facility space including operations, warehouse, administrative, etc.

        15. Revenue per employee. Total revenue for the company per income statement for the period divided by average full-time employee equivalent (FTE) including all personnel.

        16. Days sales outstanding (DSO). A measure of the average number of days that a company takes to collect revenue after a sale has been made. A low DSO number means that it takes a company fewer days to collect its accounts receivable. A high DSO number shows that a company is selling its product to customers on credit and taking longer to collect money.

        17. Fulfillment revenue per pallet stored (FRPPS). Fulfillment sales revenue per pallet stored. Shows income generated by the space used. Especially meaningful when displayed by client and can be helpful in quoting new business.

        18. What technology are you using? A table of user preferences and different technologies being employed in the operation of the fulfillment center.

        It also should be noted that there is a wealth of data concerning the operation of a warehouse from the Warehouse Education & Research Council (WERC) and other logistics associations to measure and compare the success of your operation to others.

        There is only one way to improve the operation of your company and that is with measuring your performance. Start by focusing on your P&L contribution and improving your financial performance. Then turn your focus to items 1 through 12 in the benchmark survey. Your fulfillment operation will grow and prosper as a result. I wish you good selling. n

        Tom Quinn is the recently retired director of fulfillment services for the Mailing & Fulfillment Service Association (MFSA). He is now chief consultant for Q Fulfillment Solutions, Inc. in Peachtree City, Ga. Quinn can be contacted by phone at (770) 632-9253 or through email at Tom@Qfulfillmentsolutions.com.



        The Official Publication of the Foil & Specialty Effects Association
        © 2025 All Rights Reserved
        Peterson Media Group | publish@petersonmediagroup.com
        785.271.5801
        2150 SW Westport Dr., Suite 501, Topeka, KS 66614