• Home
  • Article
    • Article Archive
    • Digital Archive
    • ENews Archive
  • Buyers Guide
    • Buyers Guide
    • 2025 Online Form
  • Advertising
    • Ad Options
    • Media Kit
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Electronic Files
  • Awards
    • FSEA Gold Leaf
  • Subscribe
  • Video Vault
  • Webinars
  • Amplify
  • Contact
  • Events
    .smi-preview#smi-preview-10580 { --smi-column-gap: 10px; --smi-row-gap: 20px; --smi-color: #ffffff; --smi-hover-color: #90c43c; ; ; --smi-border-width: 0px; ; --smi-border-radius: 0%; --smi-border-color: #3c434a; --smi-border-hover-color: #3c434a; --smi-padding-top: 15px; --smi-padding-right: 0px; --smi-padding-bottom: 0px; --smi-padding-left: 0px; --smi-font-size: 20px; --smi-horizontal-alignment: flex-end; --smi-hover-transition-time: 1s; ; }
    • Skip to main content
    • Skip to secondary menu
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
    • Events
      PostPress

      PostPress

      Print Decorating, Binding and Finishing

      • Home
      • Articles
        • Article Archive
        • Digital Archive
        • ENews Archive
      • Advertising
        • Ad Options
        • Media Kit
        • Editorial Calendar
        • Electronic Files
      • Buyers Guide
        • Buyers Guide
        • 2025 Online Form
      • Awards
        • FSEA Gold Leaf
      • Subscribe
      • Video Vault
      • Webinars
        • Upcoming Webinars
      • Amplify

        Economy

        Shifting from Populism to Pragmatism

        June 14, 2017

        by Chris Kuehl, managing director, Armada Corporate Intelligence

        The Trump campaign was a mystery from the very beginning. Pundits did not give this effort much of a chance and assumed that it would fade as soon as voters started to make real choices. Obviously, this didn’t happen. The problem for many analysts was that Trump had no real track record as far as politics or governance were concerned. It was not all that clear what he would do once in office, and positions tended to shift as the campaign demanded.

        This was a populist insurgency – driven by voter anger and frustration – as opposed to a distinct set of policy prescriptions. The people who surrounded Trump were generally just as new to governing as Trump. The assumption was that the Trump team would evolve over time, but nobody really had a sense as to how this would take place. Now that evolution has started to take shape, and it seems that pragmatism slowly is overtaking populism. This will doubtless be frustrating for some of those core supporters who assumed government would be fundamentally altered, but this transition has been welcomed in the business community and has added somewhat to the confidence levels that had been noted at the start of Trump’s term.

        One of the key differences between the campaign and the presidency thus far is that the advisers have changed – at least, some of them. The emerging inner circle is far more corporate – and business – oriented than was the inner circle during the race. The voices catching the ear of the president are pursuing a far less radical agenda and look a great deal more like the traditional base of the GOP. They have been far less antagonistic toward trade and far more supportive of agreements such as NAFTA. There has been a reversal as far as support for NATO and the Export-Import Bank, and suddenly there has been far less criticism of China and even Mexico. This doesn’t mean that all the populist messages have been abandoned, and many likely will remain part of the White House strategy, but when it comes to the day-to-day of governing, there is more reliance on those who have been around longer – and with that comes more trust in the overall business community.

        Three areas that have changed more radically than others include China policy, position on NATO and what to do with NAFTA and overall trade policy. Throughout the campaign, China was positioned as enemy number one. The country was held responsible for the decline of manufacturing jobs and the loss of US competitiveness and now would be dealt with severely. China was going to be labeled as a currency manipulator, and the US would impose everything from tariffs to legal restrictions to blunt exports from China. Today, most of those policies have been abandoned, and China has returned to its former status as partial ally. The fact is that China is vastly important to the US business community and is needed to put the brakes on North Korea. The Chinese never assumed the rhetoric was real and patiently waited for Trump to come around. With the advice of his team, Trump has returned to the positions the US pursued toward China under Obama, Bush and before.

        The relationship between China and the US has always been complex, as each country needs the other – and deeply resents that dependence at times. Both China and the US have their nationalists who resent the impact of the other country. The US resents the import surge that has driven many manufacturers out or forced them to relocate. The Chinese resent their dependence on the US to buy these products and chafe at the demands made by US buyers. The Chinese would like nothing more than to ignore the US in pursuit of its regional ambitions, but the Chinese are in no position to ignore the country that buys $350 billion of the country’s exports. For those who are counting, that is almost a quarter of the total Chinese GDP.

        A second major change is seen regarding NATO. During the campaign, Trump asserted the alliance was obsolete and that the US should no longer finance it. The policy was connected to the assertion that Europe had not being paying its fair share and owed the US money. This position was roundly criticized in Europe and stressed relations with several key US allies. That stance now has been softened, and NATO is back in the good graces of the US. It was made apparent by Trump’s military advisers that the US could not do what it wanted in the rest of the world without the support of these allies, and the criticism has been replaced by praise.

        NATO no longer is focused on the threat from the USSR. Its mission is far more complex, and troops have been engaged in every US conflict of the last 20 or 30 years. Its role in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria can’t be overlooked, and it has been engaged in Libya, Ukraine and many other hot spots. The generals who now advise Trump have urged a far more cooperative tone.

        The third major shift has involved trade policy. The Trump of the campaign trail was a classic populist, supportive of an isolationist stance that was based on strict protectionism. That stance has been changing by the day, as there has been more reliance on pro-trade advisers as well as congressional leaders who favor expanded trade. The promised changes to NAFTA are now likely to be minor, and the White House position on the Ex-Im Bank has shifted toward support. The US seems willing to pursue trade pacts again, but more attention will be paid to the economic implications than to the political motivations. The bottom line is that many are making the case that the US benefits from free trade more than most nations – after all, exports account for 14 percent of the total GDP of the country.

        Trade pacts that were far more political than economic in nature have been dismissed – as was the case with the Trans Pacific Partnership. But, pacts like NAFTA have been looked at more closely to realize what they have meant for the US. The fact is that every trade agreement will have provisions that benefit the US and provisions that benefit the other trade partner. It doesn’t hurt that the US is looking to ensure that more provisions favor America, but a full-fledged protectionist approach is now off the table.

        Chris Kuehl is managing director of Armada Corporate Intelligence. Founded by Keith Prather and Chris Kuehl in January 2001, Armada began as a competitive intelligence firm, grounded in the discipline of gathering, analyzing and disseminating intelligence. Today, Armada executives function as trusted strategic advisers to business executives, merging fundamental roots in corporate intelligence gathering, economic forecasting and strategy development. Armada focuses on the market forces bearing down on organizations. For more information, visit www.armada-intel.com.

        A First Economic Look at the Trump Administration

        March 10, 2017

        by Chris Kuehl, managing director, Armada Corporate Intelligence

        Thus it begins – at least formally. What kind of economic growth does the Trump administration seek? What kind of shape is the economy as he takes over – as compared to what other presidents before him faced? What are the chances his goals will be met, and what are the factors that will make accomplishing these goals tough and perhaps even impossible? In the most general terms, he inherits an economy that has clearly started to recover from the grinding recession that began in 2008.

        As the term starts, Trump will be facing trends that were initiated in 2016 and are expected to be a major factor in the coming year. One development is inflation – mostly driven by higher wages in select sectors. The rate now is close to two percent at the core level and is expected to continue inching up. Nobody is expecting hyperinflation or anything even close. For now, this level will actually be a good thing and stimulative to a degree. It also will help convince the Fed that rate hikes remain a good idea.

        Another development is the strong dollar, and that could be the most vexing of the three. Much has been made of the desire to promote exports and reduce imports, but a strong dollar will make that all the more difficult to obtain. Trump broke with decades of tradition by calling for the dollar to be weakened but was immediately contradicted by his treasury secretary who reiterated the US commitment to a strong dollar. Beyond the verbiage, it is hard to shift the power of the currency as this depends largely on the actions of the Fed and the overall global demand.

        As he develops policies that match the claims and aims of the campaign, Trump is in better shape than some of his predecessors while facing bigger problems than others. Labor force participation is lower than it has been since Gerald Ford was in office. It now is just a little above 62 percent and, at the start of the Obama term, it was at just over 66 percent. At the start of the term for George W. Bush, it was over 67 percent, and the two presidents before Bush (Clinton and George H.W. Bush) presided over an increase in the rate. This is a complex measure of the workforce, as there are many reasons a person may be out of the workforce. The number one factor is retirement. There have been more people ending their work careers than ever – at least 10,000 a day as the Boomers age in their golden years. Regardless of why people are leaving, there is an issue with having too few people to fill the jobs that are becoming available as too many of those seeking jobs lack the skills that are in demand.

        One of the more challenging tests will involve manufacturing, as this was a big part of the campaign and has been a concern for years. The US has been regaining its status as a manufacturing state for years and never stopped being a dominant player. These gains have largely come at the expense of jobs, as robotics and technology have replaced a lot of the people who once worked in these factories and manufacturing facilities. The number of people directly employed in manufacturing has been declining since Eisenhower was in office. It was close to 35 percent when his term started and was down to a little over 30 percent when it ended. Every president since then has presided over a further reduction of the manufacturing workforce, and Trump starts with the lowest level yet – around 8 percent of the total US workforce. Remember that these are workers who are directly engaged in manufacturing – if you count all those people who work for manufacturing companies, the percentage employed is closer to 30 percent. To increase the number of people working in manufacturing will be a nearly impossible task, given the preference for the implementation of technology. Banning imports and restricting where US companies produce will have a minor impact and could even make the problem worse, given that most manufacturing jobs are in small and mid-sized companies.

        Manufacturing in the US seems to be plagued by misnomer and myth, and this has been the case for years. For years, the story was that there was no longer a manufacturing sector in the US, although the numbers never bore this out. It has been about 30 percent of the GDP when one looks at all the people employed by the manufacturers – not just the ones who are running the machines.

        Today, the political emphasis is on manufacturing jobs, and there are myths here as well. The political assumption is that companies are ditching US workers to set up in foreign countries. Although this does still happen, the biggest issue is replacing human workers with machines – and import restrictions will have no impact on this. There is, perhaps, good intent behind the moves that Trump plans to make, but there is a good chance for a backfire if there is failure to understand the real issues in manufacturing. A steel import tax will be good for the steel industry, but not so good for the users of that imported steel – the manufacturers that Trump wants to see hire more people.

        Chris Kuehl is managing director of Armada Corporate Intelligence. Founded 2001, Armada began as a competitive intelligence firm. Today, Armada executives function as trusted strategic advisers to business executives. For more information, visit www.armada-intel.com.

        Election Results Create Path for Tax Changes

        December 9, 2016

        by Michael J. Devereux II, CPA, CMP, partner, Mueller Prost

        With Donald Trump winning the White House and Republicans maintaining majorities in both the US House of Representatives and US Senate, the prospect for tax reform and forthcoming changes to Treasury Regulations is significant. While both parties agree on the need for tax reform, their visions for the future tax code are significantly different. The Republicans’ sweep in November 2016 creates a unique environment that has enhanced the likelihood of major changes to come.

        Going into 2017, tax provisions in three competing plans will vie for a spot in a potential tax reform bill.

        President-elect Trump’s tax plan

        Donald Trump modified his tax plan to align his proposed tax rates/brackets to that of the US House of Representatives’ plan, condensing the seven existing tax brackets to three, with tax rates ranging from 12 percent to 33 percent.

        Trump’s plan will retain the existing capital gains rate, capped at 20 percent, while repealing the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax on investment and passive income. He proposed repealing the individual Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), too.

        For C Corporations, Trump’s tax plan lowers the top business tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent and eliminates the corporate AMT. Most credits and incentives would be eliminated.

        US House of Representatives: the Blueprint

        Throughout 2016, the US House of Representatives released six plans to tackle various issues within our country, including poverty, national security, the economy, the Constitution, healthcare and tax reform. The Tax Reform “Blueprint,” as it’s identified in the document released by Speaker Paul Ryan’s office, aims at simplifying the code, while increasing jobs and fueling growth.

        The Blueprint flattens and reduces the individual income tax brackets, condensing seven tax brackets to three. It proposes a maximum tax rate of 25 percent on small business income from sole proprietorships or pass-through entities (S Corporations, Partnerships and LLCs). The Blueprint repeals the individual AMT. Families and individuals would be able to deduct 50 percent of their net capital gains, dividends and interest income, leading to basic rates of 6 percent, 12.5 percent and 16.5 percent.

        Under this new approach for taxing small businesses, sole proprietorships and pass-through businesses will pay or be treated as having paid reasonable compensation to their owner-operators. Such compensation will be deductible by the business and will be subject to tax at the graduated rates for families and individuals. The compensation that is taxed at the lowest individual tax bracket rate of 12 percent effectively will further reduce the total income tax burden on these small businesses and pass-through entities.

        Moreover, the Blueprint lowers the corporate tax rate to a flat rate of 20 percent and repeals the corporate AMT. In addition, the Blueprint allows for the full and immediate expensing of the cost of investments, including tangible property (such as equipment and buildings) and intangible assets (such as intellectual property).

        Senate Finance Committee: Corporate integration

        The US Senate has taken a completely different approach to tax reform. The Senate Finance Committee (SFC) believes the first step to tax reform is to level the playing field between C Corporations and pass-through entities (S Corporations, Partnerships and LLCs). In doing so, the SFC proposes the following:

        • Allow C Corporations to deduct dividends paid;
        • Impose withholding (35 percent) on dividends and interest; and
        • Eliminate the preferential dividend rate.

        The SFC believes that by enacting these provisions, more companies will be organized as C Corporations, thus allowing Congress to enact tax reform for business and individuals as separate endeavors.

        While many believe the election results did not purport to provide a mandate to Congress and the future administration, one thing is for sure – changes are coming. Hopefully, these changes will help businesses as they compete in the US market and across the world.

        Michael J. Devereux II, CPA, CMP, is a partner and director of Manufacturing, Distribution & Plastics Industry Services for Mueller Prost. Devereux’s primary focus is on tax incentives for the manufacturing sector. For more information, email mdevereux@muellerprost.com or call 314.862.2070.

        The Economy and Print Markets in 2014-2015

        February 28, 2014

        by Dr. Ronnie H. Davis, Printing Industries of America

        Another year, another forecast and yet another year of economic and political uncertainty and intense competition in print markets. In this article, we gaze into our crystal ball to offer our projections for the economy, printing shipments, printers’ profits and other print market dynamics. Also, we offer an action plan for 2014.

        An economy stuck in second gear

        Figure 1: The outlook for 2014 and 2015 is, unfortunately, for more of the same tepid growth. Our view is that the negatives will slightly outweigh the positives over the next two years.

        So far, the pace of recovery from The Great Recession is the slowest of any recovery in the last half-century. The outlook for 2014 and 2015 is, unfortunately, for more of the same tepid growth. Our view is that the negatives will slightly outweigh the positives over the next two years, resulting in around 2.4 percent growth in 2014 and 2.6 percent growth in 2015. (Figure 1).

        Currently, there are three primary negatives.

        • There are continuing headwinds from weak global economic conditions.
        • Obamacare is creating uncertainties and increasing health care premiums, reducing consumer and business spending.
        • Political gridlock endures, preventing meaningful, permanent tax and entitlement reform.

        At the same time, there are two major positives.

        • The “sequester” will help reduce federal spending, thereby reducing the deficit and placing more resources in the private sector.
        • Low interest rates and inflation will continue.

        The biggest question mark is the direction of monetary policy from the Federal Reserve. What will be the timing and degree of the reversal of quantitative easing or purchasing of securities to increase the potential money supply and keep pressure off of interest rates? Inherent in this forecast is an assumption that the Federal Reserve can successfully temper its purchasing without a major disruption of asset markets and its wealth impact on consumer purchasing levels.

        The bottom line is a fairly pessimistic forecast of subdued annual growth of 2.4 percent in 2014 to 2.6 percent in 2015. Growth likely will escalate slightly over the period as the recovery matures and gains some strength and as consumers and businesses adjust to disruptions in the health care sector. While job creation might improve from 2013 levels, the likelihood is that the unemployment rate will remain around 7.0 percent in 2014 and 2015.

        Print’s 2014-2015 economic cycle

        Figure 2: Print generally follows nominal or non-inflation-adjusted GDP, so the most significant variable driving print – the economy – suggests modest growth at best for print markets.

        So, how will the economic scenario described here impact print markets? Print generally follows nominal or non-inflation-adjusted GDP, so the most significant variable driving print – the economy – suggests modest growth at best for print markets. However, printing shipments typically underperform the economy by 1.0–2.0 percent. Further, print usually leads in cyclical downturns, lags in upturns and does best in mature recoveries. While we may be in a mature recovery phase with the expansion now around four years old, it remains extremely weak (Figure 2).

        Table 1: Commercial print and related support activities likely will grow from around $82 billion in 2013 to $84 billion in 2014 and to $84.5 billion in 2015.

        All in all, this leads to a forecast of stable total printing shipments of $161 billion in 2014 and $159.9 billion in 2015. Within this total, commercial print and related support activities likely will grow from around $82 billion in 2013 to $84 billion in 2014 and to $84.5 billion in 2015. A major reason for growth in this portion of print is the Congressional election cycle and the pull of the economy on packaging and labels and wrappers. The increasing speed of the economy in 2015 also will add some boost to print, along with the economy moving into more of a mature (although weak) recovery (Table 1).

        The other major portion of print markets, print-related media (publishers of newspapers, periodicals, books, directories and greeting cards), likely will experience declining total shipments of around 2.0 percent in both 2014 and 2015. Total shipments in this sector still will be sizeable – $77 billion in 2014 and $75.4 billion in 2015.

        There are considerable dynamics within total print sales – by print process, print functions and specific print sectors or micro print markets.

        Figure 3: Digital print and ancillary services contribute 1.94 percent to industry growth, while traditional ink-on-paper sales contributed 2.24 percent.

        Print patterns by process. In terms of printing process, a look back at findings from a recent Printing Industries Print Market Survey demonstrates the diversity of sales growth by process. Digital toner-based print sales, digital inkjet print sales and ancillary service sales are the segments adding to industry growth. The following estimates do not add to the total change in nominal print sales in 2Q 2013 due to some respondents not offering each service at their establishments, but it helps provide a visual of what aspects of the industry are adding to or subtracting from growth. In total, digital print and ancillary services contribute 1.94 percent to industry growth, while traditional ink-on-paper sales contributed 2.24 percent (Figure 3).

        Figure 4: Growth is expected in the product logistics and market/promote function, while the inform/communicate sector will continue to decline.

        Print patterns by function. We also examine sales trends by print’s three functions—inform/communicate, product logistics and market/promote. The inform/communicate function is declining due to a shift to digital communication. The market/promote function is growing slightly, even as it faces intense competition from digital media, because print is a proven sales generator. The product logistics function is tied more directly to the economy as it faces virtually no digital competition (Figure 4).

        The bottom line is that over the next two years, we expect the highest relative growth in the product logistics sector, most likely matching real GDP growth of 2.0-3.2 percent in 2014 and 2015. Next highest in growth rate is the market/promote function, with an expected growth rate of around 1.0-2.0 percent in 2014 driven by the national election cycle before cooling to around 1.0 percent in 2015. The inform/communicate sector will continue to decline in the 2.0-3.0 percent range each year.

        Patterns by micro print markets

        Figure 5: The demand index is calculated by subtracting the proportion of printers indicating a market is declining from the percentage of printers indicating a market is increasing.

        We also track print micro markets in our surveys and sort them by hot, warm and cold segments. Here, we just report on projected hot markets for 2014 and 2015. Following is our latest tracking of the top 11 print micro markets – those with a demand index of 50-plus. Our demand index is calculated by subtracting the proportion of printers indicating a market is declining from the percentage of printers indicating a market is increasing (Figure 5).

        A projected profit plateau

        Figure 6: Profits are projected to hold up at their current rate of 2.7-2.8 percent during the next two years.

        Printing industry financial performance as measured by before tax profit as a percent of sales has steadily improved since hitting a recessionary low of -1.4 in 2010. We project that profits will hold up at their current rate of 2.7-2.8 percent during the next two years. Profit leaders, printers in the top 25 percent of profitability, will see a similar trend with profits plateauing at around 10.0 percent percent of sales (Figure 6).

        Action plan for 2014 and 2015

        So, what should your action plan for 2014-2015 contain? Your key focus should be on profits and not simply sales. Profitability is a function of three fundamentals: sales, cost and prices. Profits increase with higher sales, higher prices and lower cost; therefore, profit leaders must have higher sales, lower costs and higher prices. What follows are a few proven suggestions.

        To increase sales

        • Specialization. Printers specializing in particular segments, such as labels/wrappers or direct marketing, that focus on a vertical market generally achieve higher sales.
        • Diversification. Printing firms that provide more value-added ancillary services generally have higher profits than firms that only print.
        • Process Advantage. Digital toner-based print and inkjet are growing much faster than traditional ink-on-paper print. Hybrid printing which combines digital and inkjet with traditional processes in the same job is growing.
        • Printed Products and Services Offered. Particularly hot markets are not at all “print” as usually defined – web-to-print services, web development, signs/signage, integrated print, fulfillment and database management are hot, and printers offering these services gain margins.

        To reduce costs

        • Benchmark costs with industry metrics to determine where your costs are out of line.
        • Shift fixed to variable cost by reducing overhead – using part-time and temporary employees rather than full-time permanent employees. Further, reduce headcounts by benchmarking metrics like sales and value-added per employee and factory employee.
        • Substitute capital for labor. Profit-leading printers have higher investment per employee to “get better, not bigger.”

        Practice smart pricing

        Most printers compete on price. Profit-leading firms compete for price, charging higher prices by practicing smart pricing. Our research shows that a one-percent increase in price outscores similar percentage changes in sales or cost in terms of the profit impact by a multiple of three or more.

        Smart pricing tactics include the following:

        • Specialization, which reduces competition and allows pricing leverage
        • Deep and intimate knowledge of a customer’s needs
        • Diversification to value-added services within the specialization
        • Strong branding of the firm
        • Developing a sales compensation policy with incentives to sell at higher prices
        • Pricing that is more demand-driven and less cost-driven

        Be a learning organization

        There is only one expense category where profit leaders outspend others – education and training. Profit leaders spend more than twice the percentage of payroll on training and education as profit challengers. Further, they provide training and education to all employees – production, technical, administrative, sales and management.

        Dr. Ronnie H. Davis is senior vice president and chief economist for Printing Industries of America. For more information, contact rdavis@printing.org. This article has been reprinted with permission from PIA’s The Magazine 2014 Forecast issue.

        The Economy and Print in 2012-2013

        February 1, 2012

        by: Dr. Ronnie H. Davis, Printing Industries of America

        How will the economy and print markets perform in 2012 and 2013? Here’s our outlook:

        The 2012-2013 Economy
        At the current time, the economy is forecast to continue the slow recovery from the recession. While a return to recession is always possible, especially since the recovery has been slow, the most likely scenario is for economic growth of more than three percent over the next two years. The largest unknown, of course, is the outcome of the national elections of 2012 and its impact on federal tax and spending policies, both over the short and long term.

        2012-2013 Print Markets
        If the economy trends as projected, print markets should continue to grow. The 2012 national elections will provide an additional boost. All in all, our projection is for three percent growth in 2012 and 3.3 percent growth in 2013 on a nominal or non-inflation adjusted basis.

        In terms of print function, the national elections should give a particular boost to marketing/promotional print, which means that this function would grow at above average rates. In contrast, print intended to inform/communicate will likely grow at a less than average pace. Print logistics will likely be in between these two.

        Strategy and Tactics for the Expected Economic Cycle
        In designing strategies and tactics for the coming environment, keep in mind the key differences between print and the economy over a complete economic cycle:

        • Although we project overall printing shipments adjusted for inflation to continue to grow, on average, for the next decade, they will likely grow less than the economy – perhaps around 1-1.5 percent less. For comparison purposes, we project the economy growing by around 2.5 percent and print by 1.5 percent for our composite cycle.
        • Print generally leads recessions and lags recoveries, so that printing shipments turn down earlier as the recession begins and turn up slower once the economy recovers.
        • Print does best when the economy reaches a mature recovery phase. In this sweet spot, print actually can outgrow the economy for a few quarters.

        While printers and suppliers can’t do anything about the business cycle and these overall macroeconomic trends, they can help themselves by understanding this pattern as they manage:

        • First, be aware of not only the current health of the economy and print markets, but also their respective positions in the cycle. Just as importantly, consider the emerging directions of both. Make sure that you take this into account before making any major business decisions, such as investment in new equipment or new business segment.
        • Second, many operational decisions must be adjusted concurrent with the cycle. In particular, a focus on reducing fixed cost and making more costs variable with the business cycle is imperative. Don’t get caught with high fixed cost just as the cycle turns down.
        • Third, print’s performance in bad economic times is in line with manufacturing as a whole and is actually not that bad compared to other manufacturing sectors. This does not make it any easier to cope, but at least there are plenty of industries and firms out there suffering as much or even more than print.
        • Finally, remember to manage forward and not backward. While you have to be aware of past trends and manage for today, always remember that the cycle pattern will continue and the next up phase is coming.

        Dr. Ronnie H. Davis is senior vice president and chief economist for Printing Industries of America. He can be reached via phone at 434.591.0527 or via email at rdavis@printing.org.

        Surviving a Recession: Keeping Profits Up When the Economy is Down

        February 1, 2009

        by: Hugh Pinkus, Proudfoot Consulting

        Recession, the “R” word – it’s everywhere. Anytime conditions are favorable for an economic downturn, it becomes as dirty a word as anything heard on “The Sopranos.” The difference is that network television can and will often use this term. You can’t surf through MSNBC, CNN, or even the local news without hearing a reference to the mortgage crisis, rising energy prices, or falling consumer confidence. But recession does not have to be a dirty word. With the right foresight, planning, and action, many companies not only survive an economic downturn, but can benefit in the long run due to the new processes – such as labor optimization and inventory control – created because of it.

        Should It Stay or Should It Go?

        The first step in preventing an economic downturn from cutting into your profits is to conduct a stringent analysis and streamlining of your company’s cost structure. The administrative and operational infrastructure of all organizations tends to grow in good economic conditions, but rarely is that matched with swift reduction when business volume ebbs.

        Understanding your company’s cost structure is essential for reducing or eliminating costs that don’t impact sales. Both client-facing and support staff are involved in indirect expenses on a day-to-day basis. They are an excellent resource for identifying wasteful practices. An organization-wide approach to removing direct expenses that are no longer necessary and reducing newly unnecessary indirect expenses is the best way to ensure success.

        With your employees’ input, as well as your company’s current sales projections, you can reasonably determine your available operating funds. This is very important, because you need to know how much you need to cut back before actually beginning the process. There may be more capital to work with than originally thought.

        Given the current unfavorable business environment, instead of focusing on your annual objectives, you should determine your three-month objectives and related staff accountabilities. These decisions should be discussed with your staff members to keep everyone informed.

        After determining your available working capital, formulating your business strategy is critical. Of all the initiatives currently underway, which are most likely to bring money in the door the fastest? Also, which of your initiatives would be the easiest and most cost-efficient to complete? These programs should be given the highest priority. While politically easier to execute, irritants and projects with small dollar savings drain resources and attention from improvements that save big money.

        Labor Optimization and Communication Is Key

        Unfortunately, during an economic downturn, some hard decisions need to be made. The most obvious way to reduce costs is a reduction in staffing. A determination about those workers who add critical value and those who don’t needs to be made. One could argue that the entire staff provides critical value. In this case, which members add the least? Are there areas where responsibilities clearly overlap? In this case, one person may need to fill the shoes of two in order to weather the economic storm. Those workers who add the most critical value and are not in the firing line should be informed of this to maintain morale levels.

        Employee morale is crucial to ensuring that productivity remains strong and that the corporate environment remains upbeat. It is very important that you ensure worker participation by including them in communications so they know what is going on.

        This is an ideal time for additional training. Cross-training workers boosts productivity and flexibility because workers will possess the skills to “cover for” each other in the event of an illness, vacation, or termination. This investment in extra training also streamlines the process flow and provides deserving workers with extra responsibilities.

        Another place to start is through the examination of direct v. indirect employees. Which employees are directly involved in procurement, production, sales, promotion, and supply chain? Indirect employees, usually involved in administrative and clerical roles, are often the first to go. In many cases, these employees are hourly, or non-exempt. Are there part-timers on the staff who perform unnecessary functions? A way to cut overhead without wholesale staffing reductions is through an examination of their schedules. Is there overtime that can be cut?

        In order to cut labor costs, management also needs to take a long look at the contractors it currently works with. Contractors often have slower response times and are more prone to experience communication lapses. Although considered “on the payroll,” contractors not only work for themselves but often have other clients that distract their focus. Also, contractors work for a profit themselves, cutting into company profits. If there is a way to accomplish company objectives using current employees in lieu of contractors, this option should be examined.

        Sales and Variable Costs in Sync

        When projected sales decrease during a recessionary period, production levels need to drop proportionally. This is not the time to tie up working capital in the form of excess inventory. Management must identify costs that vary with production level and ensure that those costs are being reduced appropriately.

        During a downturn, management should utilize a multi-faceted approach to maintain or even increase company margins. One of your top priorities should be to build consistency across the organization regarding production and labor policies. If variable costs do not decrease in direct proportion to production decreases, management is failing to do its job. Essential to addressing such inconsistencies, the entire operation must be aligned toward common goals using common metrics. Performance indicators should be reviewed to ensure that they are appropriate measures of your progress.

        Profit-enhancing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) include:

        • Parts produced per labor hour – This number should remain constant and within predetermined benchmarks especially when production slows down.
        • Ratio of overtime hours to total labor hours – As production slows, the amount of overtime also should decrease – preferably at a much faster rate. Reducing overtime should be a top priority.
        • Day’s sales in finished goods inventory – This, too, should remain constant across good times and bad.
        • Day’s production in raw materials inventory – With so much focus on finished goods, tying up working capital in inventory of any form should be on your radar.
        • Maintenance labor hours worked per maintenance planned hour – Planned hours require leadership approval. Are your maintenance people stretching out projects or doing unnecessary work?
        • Ratio of administrative costs to total labor – If your employee count has dropped, you need to ensure that your administrative costs are downsized to match your new business structure. Do you really need the same number of customer service reps or payables clerks?
        • Average span of control – Do you need as many supervisors as before if your direct labor headcount is down?

        Improving Managers and Supervisors

        Improving management skills among first-level supervisors or managers gives them tools to improve margins. In an economic downturn, how these front-line managers perform their jobs is crucial because they possess the ability to improve margins at the point of production. To their credit, many companies already recognize this, and are devoting greater resources to supervisor education. Unlike many types of training, the purpose of supervisor education is to not just transfer knowledge but help instill a “culture of execution,” an environment in which plans are consistently converted to action. It is the focus on results that distinguishes this education from typical “management training.” The ultimate outcome is not simply a trained supervisor but rather an improved operation where the best demonstrated production is achieved consistently, and the best demonstrated performance is steadily improving.

        In addition, management should seriously consider conducting an assessment of current company-wide processes and procedures. Are reporting procedures as fluent as required to support new, streamlined processes? Is company performance in line with industry benchmarks? It is essential to step out of the trenches and shift to a “fact-based view” where emotions are removed from the situation. Management should consider partnering with an operational consulting firm – such initiatives often require the perspective of an experienced and objective third party. These firms specialize in enabling the necessary program changes that adapt your company to current as well as future business conditions.

        With a little planning, cost reduction, and optimization of resources, virtually any company can survive the hardship of an economic downturn. In fact, while competitors dither, lean times are periods of opportunity. All it takes is a proactive approach, proper planning, and streamlining processes. Companies that properly adapt to current conditions will see an even brighter future when the economy shifts upward.

        Hugh Pinkus is a project director for Proudfoot Consulting. Proudfoot is the recognized leader in operational management consulting. For more than 60 years, Proudfoot has specialized in implementing change to achieve measurable and sustainable performance improvement in client companies. Its teams work with client company management, and with people of all levels of the organization, to design and install programs and increase bottom-line financial results. For more information, contact Joe Froelich at (404) 260-0557 or visit www.proudfootconsulting.com.

        « Previous Page



        The Official Publication of the Foil & Specialty Effects Association
        © 2025 All Rights Reserved
        Peterson Media Group | publish@petersonmediagroup.com
        785.271.5801
        2150 SW Westport Dr., Suite 501, Topeka, KS 66614